Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > Newbie Discussion
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SyntripP measurement is hot garbage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

SyntripP measurement is hot garbage

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: SyntripP measurement is hot garbage
    Posted: 03 June 2025 at 10:13pm
Hi!
Last year we built pur own syntripps. We already used them quite a bit, but finally got a round to do some outdoor measurements. And what can i say, it looks like hot garbage, nothing like the measurments Art Welter posted.

Our SyntripPs consist of 2 B&C 10CL51 8 Ohm and one Celestion Cdx14-3050 each. Some few parts including the phase plugs and throat adapter we 3d printed in petg. Our DSP is a DBX driverack pa2 and our amp a cvr d-654. Sound source is the laptop with open sound meter

here is a free field measurment done in opensoundmeter, mid and high driver measured seperately. Mic used is a calibrated minidsp umik-1.

https://imgur.com/a/vsnylb6

So we first measured using the dsp settings suggested in the syntripPs thread: https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/syntripp-2-way-2-part-virtual-single-point-source-horn.264485/post-4115408
Hot garbage. There is a clear dip at ~750Hz, and recession in the hf.
We only got around to try and fix the +750Hz dip, and we tried lots of things. For the measurement above, in the dsp crossover, we put the mid driver lp to 1khz and the hf driver hp to 400hz, and as you can see the dip is still there. It appears the box is not really playing the frequency band at all or very quiet. Ther is no eq applied

So we are very much at our limited wisdoms end, and would love to hear some insights from you. if you need any more information, let me know. Would love to hear some insight.

Thanks


Edited by SaladDressing - 03 June 2025 at 10:17pm
Back to Top
adamb00m View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 05 February 2021
Status: Offline
Points: 75
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote adamb00m Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 5:32am
Looks like a time alignment / delay issue possibly.

Did you apply the 0.4ms delay mentioned in that link?

I’d look at this and also double check polarity is correct.

Ideally use smaart to find the true acoustic delay required.
Back to Top
Jan-2T View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 18 October 2024
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 137
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jan-2T Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 7:32am
Did you build the reflex ports or sealed?

You can always reverse the HF or MF and input a sine of X-over freq, adjust both channels so they sound the same level then increase MF delay (from zero) untill you get max cancellation.
Now un-reverse your signal and the x-over point should be as close as it gets without measuring. Now only phase shift will get some cancellation or summation in the x-over overlapping range.
Music!
Back to Top
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 1:21pm
Originally posted by adamb00m adamb00m wrote:

Looks like a time alignment / delay issue possibly.

Did you apply the 0.4ms delay mentioned in that link?

I’d look at this and also double check polarity is correct.

Ideally use smaart to find the true acoustic delay required.

We first used the 0.4ms, yes. Then we adjusted the delay bit by bit, but it only improved the dip marginally. We triple checked polarity as well. We don't have money for smaart sadly, but why would that delay finder be better than the one opensoundmeter uses?


Edited by SaladDressing - 04 June 2025 at 1:24pm
Back to Top
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 1:24pm
Originally posted by Jan-2T Jan-2T wrote:

Did you build the reflex ports or sealed?

You can always reverse the HF or MF and input a sine of X-over freq, adjust both channels so they sound the same level then increase MF delay (from zero) untill you get max cancellation.
Now un-reverse your signal and the x-over point should be as close as it gets without measuring. Now only phase shift will get some cancellation or summation in the x-over overlapping range.

With reflex ports.

Interesting, will try next time we measure


Edited by SaladDressing - 04 June 2025 at 1:25pm
Back to Top
smitske96 View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 16 February 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote smitske96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 3:59pm
Could you post a working link? Can't see the measured response.
You have any exact details of the setup? Hight from ground, dustance from DUT etc etc.
Back to Top
fudge22 View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 26 July 2022
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 263
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fudge22 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 4:41pm
Quote Looks like a time alignment / delay issue possibly.

Did you apply the 0.4ms delay mentioned in that link?

I’d look at this and also double check polarity is correct.

Ideally use smaart to find the true acoustic delay required.


Quote You can always reverse the HF or MF…….



While your comments are valid for setting up and optimising a loudspeaker, if you re-read SaladDressing’s post, you will see he states that the measurements for the two frequency ranges were done separately. If this is correct, any delay or phase reversal between the two ranges will not affect each response.

Opensoundmeter has a similar functionality to Smaart, no need for sine waves. The easiest way to set delay times is to measure the high frequency,(or whichever frequency range has the longest path) save the response, and then when measuring the mid frequency, adjust the delay until the phase graphs align at the crossover frequency.

Quote And what can i say, it looks like hot garbage


Looking at your measured response, the mid frequency response is not that dissimilar to that of the raw response of the original. Even when simulated, the peak at just below 500Hz, and the sharp drop off at 700Hz is present. That is a function of the design.

The deep notch in response at 63Hz could be due to your measurement set up. Try moving the microphone, speaker or both to see if the frequency of notch varies. Also, you could measure the the loudspeaker with a ground plane, which I believe is how the original was measured, it should smooth out the low end response.

The funky response of the mid drives, at around 1.6KHz, would normally be of little consequence, because it is out of the operating range and filtered out, either by the cross-over filter or a combination of that and an out of band parametric eq to get rid of any residual leftovers. However, that the high frequency driver shows an almost inverse response over the same frequency range is interesting. As a guess, I would suggest that it is due to some reflection or resonance near to the throat of the horn. If you know how to interpret the phase response plot, that may help.

The first thing that I would try is covering the openings for the mid drivers, in the throat of the horn, and re-measuring the high frequency driver, to see if the high frequency response smooths out.

Quote Could you post a working link?


The link works for me.
Back to Top
snowflake View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 29 December 2004
Location: Bristol
Status: Offline
Points: 3443
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote snowflake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2025 at 6:27pm
when you measured the tweeter did you have the mids either connected to an amp? If not there is not electrical damping. Or you can just short the mid drivers with a wire. Not sure this is the cause but it's easy to try.
Back to Top
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 June 2025 at 12:26am
Originally posted by smitske96 smitske96 wrote:

Could you post a working link? Can't see the measured response.
You have any exact details of the setup? Hight from ground, dustance from DUT etc etc.

I have a picture of the setup here:
https://imgur.com/a/GMOnAbL
Back to Top
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 June 2025 at 12:34am
Originally posted by fudge22 fudge22 wrote:

Quote Looks like a time alignment / delay issue possibly.

Did you apply the 0.4ms delay mentioned in that link?

I’d look at this and also double check polarity is correct.

Ideally use smaart to find the true acoustic delay required.


Quote You can always reverse the HF or MF…….



While your comments are valid for setting up and optimising a loudspeaker, if you re-read SaladDressing’s post, you will see he states that the measurements for the two frequency ranges were done separately. If this is correct, any delay or phase reversal between the two ranges will not affect each response.

Opensoundmeter has a similar functionality to Smaart, no need for sine waves. The easiest way to set delay times is to measure the high frequency,(or whichever frequency range has the longest path) save the response, and then when measuring the mid frequency, adjust the delay until the phase graphs align at the crossover frequency.

Quote And what can i say, it looks like hot garbage


Looking at your measured response, the mid frequency response is not that dissimilar to that of the raw response of the original. Even when simulated, the peak at just below 500Hz, and the sharp drop off at 700Hz is present. That is a function of the design.
Hmmm but it's nowhere near as severe in Art's measurements, or am I mistaken? In our measurements it's a ~12db dip, in art's it's only ~6db

Originally posted by fudge22 fudge22 wrote:

The deep notch in response at 63Hz could be due to your measurement set up. Try moving the microphone, speaker or both to see if the frequency of notch varies. Also, you could measure the the loudspeaker with a ground plane, which I believe is how the original was measured, it should smooth out the low end response.
Yeah those frequencies I just ignored really, we got some subs taking over from 100Hz down
Originally posted by fudge22 fudge22 wrote:

The funky response of the mid drives, at around 1.6KHz, would normally be of little consequence, because it is out of the operating range and filtered out, either by the cross-over filter or a combination of that and an out of band parametric eq to get rid of any residual leftovers. However, that the high frequency driver shows an almost inverse response over the same frequency range is interesting. As a guess, I would suggest that it is due to some reflection or resonance near to the throat of the horn. If you know how to interpret the phase response plot, that may help.
I actually have the theory that we wired up the hf driver incorrectly. Because there definitely is no inverting happening in the dsp.

Originally posted by fudge22 fudge22 wrote:

The first thing that I would try is covering the openings for the mid drivers, in the throat of the horn, and re-measuring the high frequency driver, to see if the high frequency response smooths out.
Hmmmm, would just closing the mid driver horn ports affect the hf measurement so much?


Edited by SaladDressing - 05 June 2025 at 12:36am
Back to Top
SaladDressing View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 10 November 2023
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaladDressing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 June 2025 at 12:35am
Originally posted by snowflake snowflake wrote:

when you measured the tweeter did you have the mids either connected to an amp? If not there is not electrical damping. Or you can just short the mid drivers with a wire. Not sure this is the cause but it's easy to try.

Yes, all drivers were always connected to teh amp
Back to Top
smitske96 View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc


Joined: 16 February 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1217
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote smitske96 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 June 2025 at 4:44am
I would do a new ground plane measurement.
Place the syntripp also on the ground, lets say 4m from mic (if possible) otherwise a bit less would also suffice. Place the mic capsule also as close as possible to the ground and try to get a hard and flat surface. Angle the syntripp in a way that the middle points directly at the mic capsule. 

That way you get the best actionable data to verify possible problems.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.