Speakerplans.com Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Plans > Punisher and X-tro
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Maybe build the Punisher 2’s???
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Maybe build the Punisher 2’s???

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
james folkes View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 08 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote james folkes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 June 2005 at 8:17pm
using 4 ohm drivers, you could give a pair of cabs 1200 W each for £250
with a ta-2400. powered, you'd have change from £600 for all materials
with not a bridged amp in sight.

but then you'd have 4 ohm cabs, which later on might annoy. dunno.
pretty hypothetical at present.

james.
Back to Top
rastaman View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 20 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rastaman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 June 2005 at 8:49pm
Do Neutrik Speakon's allow you to do socket switching?

What I mean is, if you build 4 ohm cabs and you use 1/4" jacks you can just have an input, and two outputs, one is a parallel out, the other interrupts the path of the -ve from the driver and allows you to link another cab in, in series. So you're two 4 ohm cabs that present an 8 ohm load, you then use the parallel out to connect to another two cabs also wired similarly so you have 4 cabs presenting a 4 ohm load, and all sharing the power evenly.

Of course you could just parallel it with one real 8 ohm cab, but then the 8 ohm cab gets twice the power of the 4 ohms.

Care must be taken when wiring the series jack to get the -ve signal feeding out on tip, and back on ring to keep the other series speaker in phase, also the parallel out must be wired across both speakers when the series jack is being used but apart from that it's pretty simple. If I had MATLAB or something, I'd sketch you a circuit.


Edited by rastaman
Back to Top
tb_mike View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 01 October 2004
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 2744
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tb_mike Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 June 2005 at 9:12pm

the angst with bridging,is probably based on two things

1)manufacturers inflated claims that dont work for low impedence dip drivers under 8hrs of stress at a real gig

2)You must remember that when bridge - each amplifer effectively sees half of the load resistance.Odd concept but its true. So bridging is effective for the higher loads while paralleling for the low loads. But theres always a limit.Im suprised we do as well as we do.

Mike

Back to Top
rastaman View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 20 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rastaman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 June 2005 at 9:21pm
Hang on, are you saying what I think your saying or the opposite?

Each channel see's a half of the total load resistance, ie. in a 4 ohm load, #1 sees 2 ohms, and #2 sees 2 ohms? That's to be expected, your connecting between the two positives? Or are you saying the other, in which case I'm baffled and surprised.

The other thing to remember is, as you lower the load, the losses in cables connectors etc. become more noticeable, or I should say more significant, leading to the troubles of warm cables, connectors etc. That cheap ass piece of 20 gauge you used to hook up one driver starts factoring in, that piece of solder you wound round another driver and terminal, as you didn't have any wire (I have seen this done, it scared me), heats up too.

If you run a low impedance load 2ohms especially but even 4 ohms, make sure all your interconnects are high quality, and clean. If someone drops a cable end in the mud, clean it up before you bung it in.

Sorry, rant over.
Back to Top
james folkes View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 08 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote james folkes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 3:36am
i know these things about bridging (especially about each channel seeing
half the load resistance, self explanatory really) and it lurks at the back of
my mind as something for driving big 8 ohm loads with. it is a heavy but
innexpensive (ish) way of powering adult cabs, consider that 4 x ta-1400
or even 4 x ep-2500 would power a few cabs in anger and still come in at
significantly less than any of the big boys out there. 8 ohm loads all
round of course.

regarding series/ paralell wiring, i came up with areally trick way of doing
it with four pole speakons but you need to make up some special leads to
do it. with 2 sockets per cab you can have any combination of series and
parallel, but i gave up in the end as it just seemed unneccesary. two 4
ohm loads in series and you are back to 8 ohms but with the biggest
power rating ever, this really wouldn't help.

hey ho. james.
Back to Top
Hyb^ View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 16 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hyb^ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 3:54pm
Originally posted by james, ind.st james, ind.st wrote:

hmm. i kind of figured this was the case. i shall be keeping my eyes open
for something which will make them sing as there isn't really any point
building them and never powering them properly. like 1850 horns, these
boxes are only for people who can afford [I]big[/I] amps. an infinite 8
would just about do the trick at 1300 W into 8 ? and 2400 W into 4 ?.

and it's over a grand... boo-hoo!

such a tempting cab though with its inexpensive driver, compact size, low
weight and huge output [I]and[/I] i've heard encouraging noises about
using 1 a side. hmm, just a thought but can you get the ciare (or similar)
in a 4 ? version? i could easily give it 725 w then, which is getting on for
useful.


Indeed, the "Cool, but now WTF do we drive them with?" question arises.
We conluded that no amp would power them sufficiently by themselves and not drop below 4ohm, while pairs of amps to do the required job is just more spendy.
We resigned to spending more in the end.

Alex @ PAP can get hold of the 4ohm versions for the same price but with a little lead time, I recall. Which would give you some more of the grunt power - but obviously with the high impedance tradeoff.

HTH,
Back to Top
james folkes View Drop Down
Old Croc
Old Croc


Joined: 08 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 3064
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote james folkes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 8:47pm
ah, just the person! i have just been corresponding with loophole (is that
the right verb for the act of a correspondance? doesn't look right...) about
punishers who said you were one of the people to talk to about real world
experiences.

you elected getting two big amps to drive all four of yours then, what
have you gone for in the end? i'd really like to know what you've got away
with and what you thought got the sweetest balance, i'm sure they must
bark a teensy bit (or should i say itsy bit) with 1500W.

i'd love to know if you've tried doing owt with one a side also, the 4 ohm
version makes a bit more sense then. whilst i kind of shudder at the
thought of 2 ohm loads i feel i've wasted carrying stuff if i'm not running
at 4. at low frequencies will a 4 ohm driver in fact drop down in
impedance to around 2 or have i got confusled again. the high impedance
trade off i presume implies that an amp can control a signal into a higher
resistive load better than into a lower one.

james.
Back to Top
Tom Umney View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4954
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom Umney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 9:33pm

Originally posted by rastaman rastaman wrote:

Do Neutrik Speakon's allow you to do socket switching?

What I mean is, if you build 4 ohm cabs and you use 1/4" jacks you can just have an input, and two outputs, one is a parallel out, the other interrupts the path of the -ve from the driver and allows you to link another cab in, in series. So you're two 4 ohm cabs that present an 8 ohm load, you then use the parallel out to connect to another two cabs also wired similarly so you have 4 cabs presenting a 4 ohm load, and all sharing the power evenly.

Of course you could just parallel it with one real 8 ohm cab, but then the 8 ohm cab gets twice the power of the 4 ohms.

Care must be taken when wiring the series jack to get the -ve signal feeding out on tip, and back on ring to keep the other series speaker in phase, also the parallel out must be wired across both speakers when the series jack is being used but apart from that it's pretty simple. If I had MATLAB or something, I'd sketch you a circuit.

LOL don't ever use 1/4 inch jacks as they can't carry high powers and the sound quality is crap using them.

XLR or speakon instead!!!

Back to Top
rastaman View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User


Joined: 20 May 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 421
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rastaman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 9:48pm
Originally posted by ToXiC ToXiC wrote:

LOL <blah>  crap <blah>.

<blah>!!!


I knew it, I just knew it.

As soon as I mention old skool (or is it olde world) technology, some young buck, still in short trousers, comes latching onto the wrong end of the stick like a rabid yorkie in a field of lamposts.

Note: I asked about Speakons, as I know that 1/4" are not suitable for high power speaker connections, however I also know that the only other common alternative, the Cannon or XLR is not capable of having a switched socket (at least in any configuration I have known). Hence me asking about Speakons.

<insert rant about the good old days here>

NB the switching capability of the 1/4" jack allows for many useful functions. That's why the sound stops coming through your speakers, when you plug headphones into a receiver. Thats how my active bass know to turn the preamp on when I insert the jack. Thats how a guitar effects pedal knows to turn on or off to save the battery. Thats also how some of my other speaker cabs know whether they are running in mono or stereo, parallel or series, or one speaker or two.

Seems like Neutrik missed a bit when they designed the Speakon, special cables pfft!
(who trusts anyone except themselves to know how and where to use a special cable?)

Back to Top
Tom Umney View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4954
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom Umney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 June 2005 at 11:16pm

Yes I know 1/4 inch jacks were used ages ago in the until the late 80's. But the 1/4 inch jacks were only used on guitar cabs or crappy disco speakers.As i've seen some pretty old pa speakers[Martin Audio CX2 co-axials] that were around 20 years old and had XLR's on them.

 Because Speakons have only been around for the last 15 years or so I think.

Back to Top
LunchieTey View Drop Down
Young Croc
Young Croc
Avatar

Joined: 06 February 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 934
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LunchieTey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2005 at 12:16am

up until 5 years ago or even less,many big name companies still didn't use anything but 1/4 plugs. They can handle quite a bit of pwer(theres still plenty of metal in QUALITY plugs-sometimes more than speakons)

As far as sound quality goes-no one can pick the difference. They are only popular now because of 2-4-8 pole models,can't short them,good contact. They can handle 30a current too but a 1/4 plug can handle almost as much unless you actually use a cheap 50c headphone model.

Before speakons came out,that's what was used and there was definately plenty of power running thru them

You know what really sounds crap? Clipping amps and overdriven bass drivers in cheap full-range cabs...

Speaker addict
Back to Top
Tom Umney View Drop Down
Registered User
Registered User
Avatar

Joined: 26 February 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4954
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom Umney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2005 at 8:58am

Sorry but thats just utter bullsh*t.

XLR's were used on big name companies before Speakons.

I lot of the Martin Audio,Turbosound and Court Acoustics pro gear used XLR's because I've seen soundsystems using them old boxes of those makes.And I've actually had a few of the old boxes from Court and Martin Audio and know they do NOT use 1/4 inch jacks.

Yes and the sound quality is crap, all the power coming through a tiny point, and no they can't handle much power.

http://colomar.com/Shavano/speaker_wiring.html

1/4 inch jacks are only ok for signal not speaker.Except they pull out easier, so locking Cannon XLR for signal is the best!

 

 

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.08
Copyright ©2001-2026 Web Wiz Ltd.