MT-121 Not completly Satisfied - Mysteries |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | ||
LeruSound
Registered User Joined: 27 August 2015 Status: Offline Points: 171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Fane looks good, as weel, has 140 Hz Fb-3 in closed box. I'm sure the horn could not lower it..
Edited by LeruSound - 30 November 2015 at 8:43pm |
||
ceharden
The 10,000 Points Club Joined: 05 June 2005 Location: Southampton Status: Offline Points: 11776 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would doubt that the 12MB700 is your problem. The specs suggest that it is a very good driver and definitely suitable for the application.
As the others have said, trying to match the horn loaded midrange with a 1" compression driver is never going to work properly. You need a larger format (3" diaphragm, 1.4" or 2" exit) driver and a large horn flare (the XT1464 from 18Sound would be ideal) to give you the control at the lower end. I would be looking to bring the crossover point down, maybe 1.2kHz as a starting point. What are you using as your low mid (kick bass) cabinet up to 180Hz? That may also be affecting how you're hearing the MT121. It's also worth bearing in mind that the MT121 is only half of the original cabinet design and is intended to be used in multiples. One horn at close range may not sound very impressive but several from further back should be. |
||
Peter Jan
Young Croc Joined: 16 December 2008 Location: Belgium Status: Offline Points: 1019 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
12PLB76 would be my choice |
||
LeruSound
Registered User Joined: 27 August 2015 Status: Offline Points: 171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Why u think it is very good? Why should the compression driver influence the lower freqs driven from the 12"? I thought that MB700, like PE32 have an high Vas and a very low Qts, this gives them an higher cut off (190 200 hz) caused from the rear closed chamber. I thought that this could be the problem in the lower end. Let's forget the 1" driver for now please . One my option is to try remove the passive xover and drive the 12" alone, and lets test it..
I mean, the response curve seems to be not so bad, but ears do not completely agree yet.
I got hybrids 18", but now i have a simple 18" relfex as midbass. Overall, my complain was on the hearing of midtops only, IMO them should be more agressiv and "deep" from the 12". I would like to hear them "vibrate" (try to get it :D ). |
||
LeruSound
Registered User Joined: 27 August 2015 Status: Offline Points: 171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
For example, SN12MB gives the MT121 a 100 Hz cut off (-3db)in the lower end freqs, caused by the rear closed chamber. Baybe to let it sound good u need more aggressive drivers. I think that it should be important to match the Vas with the Real ch volume to get a good response in 100 - 200 Hz (even if 100 is still not able to be heard, but the filter may have something to filter in that area). I will try for sure to drive them in active.. But everything is overall good, just not as i wanted in the lowers...
|
||
cravings
Old Croc Joined: 30 January 2007 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 7442 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
have you measured it at all? i think you can get simple RTA apps for phones.. i've never checked them out.
i haven't done any proper measurements of my mt121s, but it really looked like the 12 didn't play above about 900hz at all. maybe there's just a lot of information missing because of the high crossover point, which will indeed make the box sound off. i've never really figured out the best way to run mine either if i'm honest. sometimes they're great, other times.. i'm not sure about them at all. but i crossover at 150 and 900 i think. |
||
bee
Old Croc Joined: 14 June 2011 Location: Middlesex Status: Offline Points: 4553 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
the only 1" worth using in the mt121 is the bms4550 as you can run it from 900hz.... getting the 12" to play above 900hz forget it.... best 12" 1" combinations ive personally heard used BMS 12n610 and bms4550 B&C 12ndl76 and bms4550 non budget option bms12n610 with the bms 4590 2" 1" coaxil... (the 4590 will easy keep up in the mt122 so prob overkill in the mt121) no driver in real world will play to 100hz, just not going to happen in the mt, 150hz for most drivers, -6 at 140hz for some drivers... Edited by bee - 30 November 2015 at 10:00pm |
||
https://www.elements-audio.com
|
||
LeruSound
Registered User Joined: 27 August 2015 Status: Offline Points: 171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
So if i choose a driver which can handle 100 Hz in that box, for sure it will handle 150 140 as u say..
My choiche would have been 12PLB100 |
||
bee
Old Croc Joined: 14 June 2011 Location: Middlesex Status: Offline Points: 4553 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
the box full stop will not allow a driver to play 100hz, your kill the driver. By design its not designed for that frequency.... There are 100's of threads re the mt, and best possible drivers, There is only 1 1" driver currently available in the world worth trying in the mt and that's the bms4550, as its capable of playing from 900hz... if you want 100hz your need to use a suitable high bass cab or a dedicated kick cab.... ive listed already for a b&C the best driver is 12ndl76 from bms its the 12n610, Ive tested and measured mant many 12" drivers in horns, and listened to many more... possible 1" horns worth looking at are faital pro lth102 or the rcf
Edited by bee - 30 November 2015 at 10:27pm |
||
https://www.elements-audio.com
|
||
bee
Old Croc Joined: 14 June 2011 Location: Middlesex Status: Offline Points: 4553 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
your looking at the cab the wrong way.... look at drivers to play up as high as possible, almost all 12" drivers can handle 150hz... but very few can play to 900hz in the mt before the frequency waves start breaking up inside the horn...
|
||
https://www.elements-audio.com
|
||
LeruSound
Registered User Joined: 27 August 2015 Status: Offline Points: 171 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
An example could be the PAS5MA1 or other Selenium 2x12". The plan got a similar horn and a very similar small closed rear chamber. If u get a look of the suggested driver u will se that them have the same parameters as the SN12B in MT121.
Volume is around 18 L for 1 woofer. The woofer got small Vas (45 l) high Qts (0.44) and Fs 63 Hz. All togheter, after calculation, returns me an Fb -3 around 100 Hz. On the plan is written to HPF the 12" section at 200 Hz, seems legit. The most of the drivers u have showed me give results around 160 230 Hz of Fb. 160 could be a good choice, but why choose it when i could do better?
So Fb -3 is around 100 Hz, but i will also cut it at 180 Hz, 24dB/oct slope. It means that in 90 Hz there will be -24 dB, but at 160 there will be the add of MB and MT that gives me the right feeling. So, unless it is not a reflex midrange, that could help me reach the lower possible, i would like to choose the best sounding driver for it, like the P audio SN12MB, but i would prefeer to get a better brand. So B&C, 18Sound and RCF are my choice. U still think it is better to place a 12PE32 inside it and cut it at 150 Hz but a right tuned one with the parameters that seems legit for that supersmall box? |
||
MarjanM
Old Croc Joined: 10 February 2005 Location: Macedonia Status: Offline Points: 7816 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Am i the only one seeing the problem here? If this is the real measurement of the box then you need to attenuate the HF for at least 3-4db to even out the response.
|
||
Marjan Milosevic
MM-Acoustics www.mm-acoustics.com https://www.facebook.com/pages/MM-Acoustics/608901282527713 |
||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |