![]() |
Whats the difference with JTS and |
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Author | ||
wasup
Registered User
Joined: 26 April 2007 Location: Bahrain Status: Offline Points: 295 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 November 2007 at 12:21pm |
|
I aint agianst YOU M ! You should know that? I tell anyone who want a PRE to go to YOU so lol WASUP?????
|
||
![]() |
||
DUBPLATE
Registered User
Joined: 27 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 366 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 November 2007 at 2:05am |
|
if u like wat u hear
u got a followin
u makin money
it hasnt cost u too much to get wat u want
carry on doin wat u want till u can afford to buy beta stuff
|
||
![]() |
||
King Simeon
Young Croc
Joined: 13 January 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 794 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 November 2007 at 2:01pm |
|
|
I think there are two points in answer to the original question, both have been expressed, so its clear it just down to opinion/preference.
You can work out any set up to run a sound, you could use fifty different pieces of equipment to run it thru. Many sounds to the day are still playing round with different ways of setting up. Thats the 'fun' of sound system. Whether you can hear much difference.....? I've not heard anything that drastic to make me think its all that worthwhile.
The pre amp makes running a whole heap of equipment simple. The ammount of technicals every sound has, its handy to have signals as straight forward to trace/control. As i see it the pre amp is the ideal custom built solution, fed from experience since the begininngs of sound system. If you have any way different to run sound, thats choice, and also a natural development in running sound. There are no rules.
Personally, i couldn't run it without a pre. I dont have enough technical knowledge to know how to make a set up that is cheaper and as effective, and good; to my ears. I remember Tubbys played a session in Nottingham, think it was with Smith & Mighty. Tubbys took about 12k and S&M(!!) had somthing like 60!!! Tubbys out weighted comfortably. There are countless stories similar, ie. Boomshackalacka sound, their spec stood up to others with a lot bigger. Simple things, no secret buttons/units business.
Bottom line, it's what you do with what you got. Personally Jah Voice spent a whole heap of money on equipment, but i get no flavour from their sound. All productions sound the same thru their set, lack 'character'. I like to hear 'difference', ruff around the edges is part of the music, check the cycle of old hardware/sounds coming back in vogue in productions. Also it should be noted that a lot of material played on sounds as dubplate are often un-mastered, its difficult to 'shine a turd'. Again, character, if the vibes are there, which is the reason it gets to reach a session as a special dub, let it runnnnnn same way! I still look forward to developments with Voice, they're making a lot more of their own tunes and full respect for that. It's only my preference on their sound, i'm just more keen on hearing more of their productions, there's a lot of experience in there.
|
||
![]() |
||
tweeter box
Old Croc
Joined: 21 October 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 6784 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 November 2007 at 4:26pm |
|
|
Respect King Simeon for your opinion
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |